Does following insiders actually work?

We took every open-market insider purchase on file, marked the price on the day the filing went public — the moment an alert would fire — and measured what the stock did next. Then we did the same for the S&P 500 over the identical dates, so you can see the edge beyond a rising market.

Up one month later
56%
Share of insider buys trading above the filing-day price after ~21 trading days
Beat the S&P 500
50%
Share that outperformed the index over the same one-month window
Average excess return
+3.0%
Mean one-month return above the S&P 500, per signal

By size of the buy

Bigger checks tend to carry more conviction. Win rate = % of signals above the filing-day price; Beat S&P = % that also outran the index.

Buy sizeSignalsUp @1DUp @1WUp @1MBeat S&P @1MAvg excess @1M
$10K-50K4,50160%58%
55%
47%
+2.2%
$50K-250K4,16566%62%
58%
50%
+2.3%
$250K-1M1,86170%65%
59%
54%
+4.5%
$1M+1,52668%65%
55%
49%
+5.1%
All buys12,05365%61%
56%
50%
+3.0%

How we measured this

  • Signals: open-market purchases only (Form 4 code P, shares acquired) — grants, option exercises, and gifts are excluded. Minimum trade value $10K.
  • Entry: the adjusted closing price on the first trading day on or after the filing became public — i.e. the price you could realistically act on when an alert fires, not the insider's (earlier, non-public) trade date.
  • Windows: +1, +5 (≈1 week), and +21 (≈1 month) trading days, using split/dividend-adjusted closes throughout.
  • Benchmark: the S&P 500 (SPY) measured over the exact same dates; “excess” is the stock's return minus the index's.
  • Coverage: based on 12,053 signals across 2,107 tickers, 2025-01-02 to 2026-04-28. Signals on tickers without price coverage (e.g. since-delisted names) are excluded, which can introduce survivorship bias.

Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is research, not investment advice.

The Edge · Do insider buys actually beat the market? · Watch4Insider